To send a copy of any BLOG to a friend, click on the BLOG Title, Then click on “mail this” button below BLOG.
Enter the information requested and any comments you wish and click send.

Send other comments to: Info@NorthPacificResearch.com

 

Chilling Conclusions

Science, November 16, 2007 page 1054: An article titled –“Scientist Say Continued Warming Warrants Closer Look at Drastic Fixes—stated “…Last week a group of prominent researchers who gathered here (Cambridge) gave a qualified yes.” The question was should scientists study novel ways to alter Earth’s climate…

Of all the chilling conclusions that have been attached to global warming, this is by far the worst. We can deal with melting polar ice, drowned Polar bears, flooded cities, loss of habitat, but sure as the sun will rise tomorrow, having a bunch of radical, egotistical, academic research scientists, fregging around with the world’s weather is the most frightening consequence of global warming.

After over twenty years of studying the problem, none, zero, zip, nada of these brilliant scientist have ever connected the problem to the cause. The problem is not industrialization. Industry is directly proportional to population; the more population—the more industry. If there were less people to buy their products, industry would not waste money on making more of them. Duh!

It is not energy. If there were less people, we would need less energy, fewer cars, fewer freeways, and require less raw materials, which means less impact to the environment. Duh! Less population means less hunger, and less unrest, basically a healthy happier world.

Are these over educated scientists who think that it is necessary to fund radical “geoengineering experiments” on the planet, really concerned about the planet or are they concerned about Noble Prizes, fame, stature and the money these experiments would bring. It’s time to take the power and money away from the academics, and do something about population control. First, it is necessary to face the fact that zero population growth will not solve the problem. The world must have a negative population growth until we can reach a stable population level, then increase the population to zero growth level.

Reducing the population will be strongly opposed by powerful religious and political groups, who rely on the numbers of their supporters for their religious or political power. However, the people provide this power and they can take it away. Religious and political leaders must face the upcoming Armageddon that they are bringing down on the human race. If they do not drastically change their policy, humanity must rebel.

Men have fought the wars of the past, but this is a battle that women are better equipped to handle. The women of the world are the primary answer to this problem. Certainly at one time, having and raising healthy happy children is the most difficult task and if done correctly the most rewarding job on the planet, however times have changed. Humanity must stop measuring the value of women on the number of children they produce, and give them other and better ways of finding value in their lives. We must emphasis, that it is the quality; not the quantity of children that counts. A single child is all that is needed to see that your genes are immortal. A single child does not necessarily need siblings, to have a healthy life. A good kindred spirit will serve as well. Birth control has advanced considerably since the 1950’s and many options are available that will insure other options than conception and increased population.



Don Dodds

http://northpacificresearch.com/blog/



Page :  1 
 
To send a copy of any BLOG to a friend, click on the BLOG Title, Then click on “mail this” button below BLOG.
Enter the information requested and any comments you wish and click send.

Send other comments to Info@NorthPacificResearch.com