To send a copy of any BLOG to a friend, click on the BLOG Title, Then click on “mail this” button below BLOG.
Enter the information requested and any comments you wish and click send.

Send other comments to: Info@NorthPacificResearch.com

 

The Problems with Critiquing the Oregonian

We have become aware that we are repeating ourselves. We beg your pardon, we suddenly realized that is because we are critiquing the Oregronian, and they just repeat the same nonsense over and over. See below. In the future, we shall try to branch out a little.

Oregroanian May 5, 2007 page A1: An article titled –Chill out, world: we all can limit global warming – States “The united Nations Panel on Climate change, which until now has laid out doomsday global warming scenarios, had some good news Friday: Climate change can be limited and at a reasonable price.” This sounds like the old bait and switch. Now that we have gotten your attention just do as we say and nobody will get hurt.

Sorry United Nations Panel on Climate Change and My way or the highway Oregroanian we are not buying your advice. We cannot limit climate change at a reasonable price, especially if we do as they direct. The scientists on the panel are not doing science they are doing behavior modification and that is the realm of religion. Science by definition is supposed to be free of bias. The science behind the global warm theory is extremely closed-minded and ignores significant evidence that is contrary to their religious beliefs.

Anyone who thinks that “putting on a sweater, …buying a hybrid car, …hanging laundry out to dry” stress in the article, will solve this problem either is an idiot or thinks that global climate change is a vehicle to modify behavior. In truth, we do not know if the global temperature is rising, but we do know that the proposed solution will not affect the temperature of the globe.

If you like simple solutions, the problem is quite simply population, population, population. One hundred years ago there were 2 billion people on the planet, today the population is close to 7 billion. Increasing the population by a factor 3.5 will increase the energy use, industry, poverty, hunger and pollution by the same factor. The science behind this statement is overwhelming. Why is this solution being ignored? Could it be because it is not pleasant solution? Sometimes solving problems is not pleasant.

It should be obvious that planet cannot support an infinite number of humans. It is also obvious that there is an optimum number of humans the planet can support. Stopping growth is unfortunately not the answer. The population growth must be reversed. If you just want life, stop growth if you want a GOOD life growth has to be reversed.



By the Staff

http://northpacificresearch.com/blog/



Page :  1 
 
To send a copy of any BLOG to a friend, click on the BLOG Title, Then click on “mail this” button below BLOG.
Enter the information requested and any comments you wish and click send.

Send other comments to Info@NorthPacificResearch.com